@what_game_is_this said in #14:
> #12
> No such law exists. There is a possibility to voluntarily send troops.
Well I never mentioned a law
@Noflaps said in #17:
> Ukraine was NOT in NATO.
They really wanted to enter it and NATO wanted to even if the USA promised to not expand NATO.
> You don't need to destroy city after city to keep Ukraine out of NATO.
Actually a human watch report said that Ukrainian troops hid in cities filled with civilians. What’s more, Ukraine doesn’t even want to respect humanitarian corridors instated by Russians.
> Even after all this, Ukraine is STILL not in NATO. The invasion just made people WANT to put them in NATO. But we shouldn't.
They wanted to put Ukraine in NATO before the invasion.
> Hitler gave B.S. "reasons" for invading the Chechs and Poland, too. Don't believe such nonsense.
Well I totally don’t support Hitler but Poland decided to cut the Danzig corridor.
> True, much of the world's nonsense right now us
@s2numbuq35i said in #18:
> Why not? Because Putin doesn't allow it? Or because you're afraid he'll start nuclear war? Whatever your answer, Putin should have no say in who gets to join NATO, because Putin is not in NATO. His type of aggressor is the reason NATO exists in the first place.
As I said already, the USA promised to Gorbachev that NATO will go down if the USSR goes down and then they said to Putin that they won’t expand in Eastern Europe.
> What he can do is treat his neighboring countries so badly (literally raping, looting and pillaging them)
There is no proof for that so this statement is false.
>that they want to join any mutual defense pact, which is their right and due course of action considering the vicious threat to their safety. So invigorating NATO pull was his doing, as NATO was in some ways on its ass before he emboldened it and rekindled member states' commitment to its finances.
NATO is legally a mutual Defense pact but it is just made to intimidate Russia and the USSR.
> His action have European leaders talking about doubling(!) our weapons budget. I observe Putin not as a leader, but as a pawn for the fossil and weapons industries, which together are larger than the USA economy itself.
It seems that he is a pawn that gains a better economy for his country - I don’t understand why this is hatable.
> #12
> No such law exists. There is a possibility to voluntarily send troops.
Well I never mentioned a law
@Noflaps said in #17:
> Ukraine was NOT in NATO.
They really wanted to enter it and NATO wanted to even if the USA promised to not expand NATO.
> You don't need to destroy city after city to keep Ukraine out of NATO.
Actually a human watch report said that Ukrainian troops hid in cities filled with civilians. What’s more, Ukraine doesn’t even want to respect humanitarian corridors instated by Russians.
> Even after all this, Ukraine is STILL not in NATO. The invasion just made people WANT to put them in NATO. But we shouldn't.
They wanted to put Ukraine in NATO before the invasion.
> Hitler gave B.S. "reasons" for invading the Chechs and Poland, too. Don't believe such nonsense.
Well I totally don’t support Hitler but Poland decided to cut the Danzig corridor.
> True, much of the world's nonsense right now us
@s2numbuq35i said in #18:
> Why not? Because Putin doesn't allow it? Or because you're afraid he'll start nuclear war? Whatever your answer, Putin should have no say in who gets to join NATO, because Putin is not in NATO. His type of aggressor is the reason NATO exists in the first place.
As I said already, the USA promised to Gorbachev that NATO will go down if the USSR goes down and then they said to Putin that they won’t expand in Eastern Europe.
> What he can do is treat his neighboring countries so badly (literally raping, looting and pillaging them)
There is no proof for that so this statement is false.
>that they want to join any mutual defense pact, which is their right and due course of action considering the vicious threat to their safety. So invigorating NATO pull was his doing, as NATO was in some ways on its ass before he emboldened it and rekindled member states' commitment to its finances.
NATO is legally a mutual Defense pact but it is just made to intimidate Russia and the USSR.
> His action have European leaders talking about doubling(!) our weapons budget. I observe Putin not as a leader, but as a pawn for the fossil and weapons industries, which together are larger than the USA economy itself.
It seems that he is a pawn that gains a better economy for his country - I don’t understand why this is hatable.