Now that Lichess Site calculates the accuracy of our games when we request computer analysis,
Am thinking LiChess should be updated further to include analysis comments such as the ones below::
1. Brilliant Move
2. Great move
3. Best Move
4. Excellent move
5. Good move
6. Inaccuracy
7. Bad move (Mistake)
8. Blunder
9. Missed win
i doubt for the brilliant, best, excellent & good move because the game itself is analysed by the legendary stockfish which means he only play & recommend best moves.
in short, there's no brilliancy with stockfish, he is a chess monster, legend & etc, no one can beat stockfish at his full strength.
but don't be frustrated, maybe details by the end of analysis paper would be helpful like:
*how many mistakes & Blunders where found on opening, middle game & endgame respectively.
*how many best move & inferior best moves (good moves) where found on your game.
*how many book move where found on your game & what is the last book move on that game according to Lichess opening feature.
*which position in the game takes from you a lot of time to think & come up with a move [i consider these positions as my critical positions]? & so for your opponent, which position in the game cause him to take alot time & come up with a move [opponent critical position]? (if there would be a highlighted clickable move eg Nxf7+ that if u click it will send you directly to the position it would be Great!
* average time elapsed in opening, middle game or endgame.
*how many missed winning moves where found in your game (including missed checkmates)
eventually trying to say quantitative data will provide good summary & easy diagnosis of your game comparing to the qualitative data.
Since Steinitz we have established that a player can only deteriorate the current game balance with a bad move, not improve it with a good move. So good moves, brilliant moves and so on are purely subjective evaluations, connected to the practical aspect of the game. An only move is not always brilliant, sometimes it is very difficult to find and sometimes it is completely obvious.
